Rare Book Monthly

Articles - November - 2021 Issue

One of America's Best-Selling Authors Has Turned 100 Years Old

The first portrait of Betty Crocker, created when she was 15 years old (1936).

The first portrait of Betty Crocker, created when she was 15 years old (1936).

This year we are celebrating the 100th birthday of one of America's most popular authors. Her first book has sold over 75 million copies, but she has written about 250 in total. We don't have counts for the other 249, but it must be a lot. Everyone knows her name, and if you haven't purchased one of her books, you undoubtedly have purchased something else she makes.

 

Not too many people hang around long enough to celebrate their 100th birthday, and that is true of our author. Sadly, she is no longer with us. Actually, she never was. She was a fiction from the day she was “born” 100 years ago. Many people realize this, but many others do not and are shocked to learn there is no real Betty Crocker and never was. However, she is no more real than her brother at General Mills, the Pillsbury Doughboy. No one ever thought he was real.

 

Betty Crocker was born in the Washburn-Crosby flour mill of Minneapolis in 1921. The firm had run a contest in the Saturday Evening Post for their Gold Medal Flour. Along with contest entries, many people wrote letters to the firm, primarily looking for cooking tips. The firm's Advertising Director, Sam Gale, decided to answer all of those letters. However, he thought the women who wrote most of them would not take kindly to a man telling them how to run their kitchen. He decided to create a woman to answer the letters, choosing the name Betty Crocker since Crocker was the last name of a retired company director, and the name sounded wholesome and reassuring, a good name for a friend to the homemaker.

 

The letters kept coming, and “Betty” and her large staff of assistants kept answering them all. While cooking was the primary focus, Betty's friendly and helpful image led to people asking advice on all types of issues. In 1928, Washburn-Crosby combined with some other mills to form General Mills, now a massive conglomerate producing all sorts of foodstuffs, with Betty's friendly face appearing on many. Her image has changed with the times, to a more contemporary look, but she has stayed forever young, or more accurately, forever middle-aged.

 

As if she weren't already busy enough, Betty turned her hand to writing in 1950. That is when she published the Betty Crocker Cookbook. That is the one that has sold 75 million copies and counting. As with the letters, she had her staff lend a hand with the book writing. Recipes have changed over the years, and while some are daring, it maintains a staple of “meat-and-potatoes” type dishes, things with which people can feel comfortable, comfort food if you will. One that has remained since the beginning is banana bread, evidently a timeless favorite.

 

One other thing has changed since Ms. Crocker started writing as a lady of merely 29 years of age. Not so many recipes are based on starting from scratch. In those days, most women were expected to be homemakers, preparing dinner for when her man came home from “work.” Back then, men incorrectly believed they were the partner who worked hardest. Today's recipes feature more prepackaged foods and mixes as women do both the traditional jobs of their own and their husband's. For some reason, this is considered as emancipation from traditional roles. Betty isn't fooled. She keeps Mr. Crocker in the kitchen baking banana bread.


Posted On: 2021-11-01 02:46
User Name: bukowski

Rather paternalistic and old-fashioned view of relations between men and women at the end there. Perhaps your ancestors were slave owners?


Posted On: 2021-11-01 04:42
User Name: ae244155

I guess your point is that if someone's ancestors many generations ago were slave owners or did something else terrible, their descendants 160 years later are terrible. Interesting theory.


Posted On: 2022-02-02 03:05
User Name: drmaio30

Good day fellow book lovers, I read this article by chance, as to find who might be the author of such a body of work. I was very interested to find the subject was the imaginary icon of North American cooking, Ms. Betty Crocker. That being said, I was also struck by the ideas presented in the last paragraph of the piece. Being a history major as an undergraduate student in the 1980s, I had an elective class which embraced early twentieth century american (U.S.) social and cultural history. One of the areas studied in this course was the “Cult of Domesticity” as it pertained to Women in normalized society for the era/ historical period covered. This topic was interpreted by modern historians, who had lived through or experienced a post war (WWII - Vietnam), post civil rights, and post equality/ equal rights era of North American society. I don’t remember the history as being overly critical of the ideas of the said time period, as much as it was informative of the practiced and observed relational deliniations between Men and Women in modern industrial society. Since those earlier times, Women in the United States of America have made incredible gains in all areas of social, economic, and cultural endeavor.
That being said, one can make an argument that Women, in those times , worked equally as hard as Men, albeit in different jobs and capacities. It is not my purpose to illuminate or discuss this notion, because of its complexity and depth. I will offer my opinion that this country, the United States of America, was built on the backs of Men…the Men who timbered wood, who mined coal and iron, who plowed fields for food; Men that black-smithed, hammered, sawed, shoveled, pulled, dug, pushed, harvested; Men who built homes with the wood, and skyscrapers with the steel made in mills, by these same Men; Men that welded bridges, boilers, ocean liners, and oil tankers; Men that broke horses for riding; Men that built stage coaches for moving people, cargo and mail; Men that built cars and trucks; Men that built the railways, made roads, and constructed interstate highway systems; Men that set poles and then climbed those poles to install electric and phone lines across entire the U.S.; Men that enlisted, fought, suffered, died in the World Wars and witnesssed the horrors of humanity on a personal level, and then retured to normal life to begin again; Men that assumed the responsibilty for the lives and well being of their Wives, children, friends, family, and community. These are just a small handful of reasons why Men who lived during the Betty Crocker years, may have held the opinion that they worked harder than their Wives or Women, in general.
The ideas that Men would prefer not to subject Women to the toil and physical hardship of manual labor, the horrors of war and battle, or the financial responsibility for all in their charge, were cultural and societal norms that were generally believed and practiced by most, in those bygone days. Back then, and now, Women were and should be protected from harm and treated with a higher form of respect, care, and courtesy. But these virtues are becoming lost in the new reality of modern feminism and its progenators. I understand that there is currently a bipartisan movement in the U.S. Congress to require young Women to apply for selective service, just like young Men, at the age of eighteen years. It disenheartens and angers me to believe that my seventeen year old daughter might be drafted and have to go to war (in some capacity) in the near future. Horray for a century of hard-fought, hard-earned progressive american feminism…. Congratulations, here’s your battle rifle! Betty Crocker better get ready to fight for herself...It doesn’t sound like she ever found a real husband, certainly not a Man!


Posted On: 2022-02-02 03:13
User Name: drmaio30

Good day fellow book lovers, I read this article by chance, as to find who might be the author of such a body of work. I was very interested to find the subject was the imaginary icon of North American cooking, Ms. Betty Crocker. That being said, I was also struck by the ideas presented in the last paragraph of the piece. Being a history major as an undergraduate student in the 1980s, I had an elective class which embraced early twentieth century american (U.S.) social and cultural history. One of the areas studied in this course was the “Cult of Domesticity” as it pertained to Women in normalized society for the era/ historical period covered. This topic was interpreted by modern historians, who had lived through or experienced a post war (WWII - Vietnam), post civil rights, and post equality/ equal rights era of North American society. I don’t remember the history as being overly critical of the ideas of the said time period, as much as it was informative of the practiced and observed relational deliniations between Men and Women in modern industrial society. Since those earlier times, Women in the United States of America have made incredible gains in all areas of social, economic, and cultural endeavor.
That being said, one can make an argument that Women, in those times , worked equally as hard as Men, albeit in different jobs and capacities. It is not my purpose to illuminate or discuss this notion, because of its complexity and depth. I will offer my opinion that this country, the United States of America, was built on the backs of Men…the Men who timbered wood, who mined coal and iron, who plowed fields for food; Men that black-smithed, hammered, sawed, shoveled, pulled, dug, pushed, harvested; Men who built homes with the wood, and skyscrapers with the steel made in mills, by these same Men; Men that welded bridges, boilers, ocean liners, and oil tankers; Men that broke horses for riding; Men that built stage coaches for moving people, cargo and mail; Men that built cars and trucks; Men that built the railways, made roads, and constructed interstate highway systems; Men that set poles and then climbed those poles to install electric and phone lines across entire the U.S.; Men that enlisted, fought, suffered, died in the World Wars and witnesssed the horrors of humanity on a personal level, and then retured to normal life to begin again; Men that assumed the responsibilty for the lives and well being of their Wives, children, friends, family, and community. These are just a small handful of reasons why Men who lived during the Betty Crocker years, may have held the opinion that they worked harder than their Wives or Women, in general.
The ideas that Men would prefer not to subject Women to the toil and physical hardship of manual labor, the horrors of war and battle, or the financial responsibility for all in their charge, were cultural and societal norms that were generally believed and practiced by most, in those bygone days. Back then, and now, Women were and should be protected from harm and treated with a higher form of respect, care, and courtesy. But these virtues are becoming lost in the new reality of modern feminism and its progenators. I understand that there is currently a bipartisan movement in the U.S. Congress to require young Women to apply for selective service, just like young Men, at the age of eighteen years. It disenheartens and angers me to believe that my seventeen year old daughter might be drafted and have to go to war (in some capacity) in the near future. Horray for a century of hard-fought, hard-earned progressive american feminism…. Congratulations, here’s your battle rifle! Betty Crocker better get ready to fight for herself...It doesn’t sound like she ever found a real husband, certainly not a Man!


Posted On: 2022-02-02 03:14
User Name: drmaio30

Good day fellow book lovers, I read this article by chance, as to find who might be the author of such a body of work. I was very interested to find the subject was the imaginary icon of North American cooking, Ms. Betty Crocker. That being said, I was also struck by the ideas presented in the last paragraph of the piece. Being a history major as an undergraduate student in the 1980s, I had an elective class which embraced early twentieth century american (U.S.) social and cultural history. One of the areas studied in this course was the “Cult of Domesticity” as it pertained to Women in normalized society for the era/ historical period covered. This topic was interpreted by modern historians, who had lived through or experienced a post war (WWII - Vietnam), post civil rights, and post equality/ equal rights era of North American society. I don’t remember the history as being overly critical of the ideas of the said time period, as much as it was informative of the practiced and observed relational deliniations between Men and Women in modern industrial society. Since those earlier times, Women in the United States of America have made incredible gains in all areas of social, economic, and cultural endeavor.
That being said, one can make an argument that Women, in those times , worked equally as hard as Men, albeit in different jobs and capacities. It is not my purpose to illuminate or discuss this notion, because of its complexity and depth. I will offer my opinion that this country, the United States of America, was built on the backs of Men…the Men who timbered wood, who mined coal and iron, who plowed fields for food; Men that black-smithed, hammered, sawed, shoveled, pulled, dug, pushed, harvested; Men who built homes with the wood, and skyscrapers with the steel made in mills, by these same Men; Men that welded bridges, boilers, ocean liners, and oil tankers; Men that broke horses for riding; Men that built stage coaches for moving people, cargo and mail; Men that built cars and trucks; Men that built the railways, made roads, and constructed interstate highway systems; Men that set poles and then climbed those poles to install electric and phone lines across entire the U.S.; Men that enlisted, fought, suffered, died in the World Wars and witnesssed the horrors of humanity on a personal level, and then retured to normal life to begin again; Men that assumed the responsibilty for the lives and well being of their Wives, children, friends, family, and community. These are just a small handful of reasons why Men who lived during the Betty Crocker years, may have held the opinion that they worked harder than their Wives or Women, in general.
The ideas that Men would prefer not to subject Women to the toil and physical hardship of manual labor, the horrors of war and battle, or the financial responsibility for all in their charge, were cultural and societal norms that were generally believed and practiced by most, in those bygone days. Back then, and now, Women were and should be protected from harm and treated with a higher form of respect, care, and courtesy. But these virtues are becoming lost in the new reality of modern feminism and its progenators. I understand that there is currently a bipartisan movement in the U.S. Congress to require young Women to apply for selective service, just like young Men, at the age of eighteen years. It disenheartens and angers me to believe that my seventeen year old daughter might be drafted and have to go to war (in some capacity) in the near future. Horray for a century of hard-fought, hard-earned progressive american feminism…. Congratulations, here’s your battle rifle! Betty Crocker better get ready to fight for herself...It doesn’t sound like she ever found a real husband, certainly not a Man!


Rare Book Monthly

  • SD Scandinavian Art & Rare Book Auctions
    The Odfjell Collection
    Polar – History – Ornithology – Colour Plate Books
    Ending December 4th
    Scandinavian Art & Rare Books Auctions, Dec. 4: ROALD AMUNDSEN: «Sydpolen» [ The South Pole] 1912. First edition in jackets and publisher's slip case.
    Scandinavian Art & Rare Books Auctions, Dec. 4: AMUNDSEN & NANSEN: «Fram over Polhavet» [Farthest North] 1897. AMUNDSEN's COPY!
    Scandinavian Art & Rare Books Auctions, Dec. 4: ERNEST SHACKLETON [ed.]: «Aurora Australis» 1908. First edition. The NORWAY COPY.
    Scandinavian Art & Rare Books Auctions, Dec. 4: ERNEST SHACKLETON: «The heart of the Antarctic» + SUPPLEMENT «The Antarctic Book», 1909.
    Scandinavian Art & Rare Books Auctions, Dec. 4: SHACKLETON, BERNACCHI, CHERRY-GARRARD [ed.]: «The South Polar Times» I-III, 1902-1911.
    SD Scandinavian Art & Rare Book Auctions
    The Odfjell Collection
    Polar – History – Ornithology – Colour Plate Books
    Ending December 4th
    Scandinavian Art & Rare Books Auctions, Dec. 4: [WILLEM BARENTSZ & HENRY HUDSON] - SAEGHMAN: «Verhael van de vier eerste schip-vaerden […]», 1663.
    Scandinavian Art & Rare Books Auctions, Dec. 4: TERRA NOVA EXPEDITION | LIEUTENANT HENRY ROBERTSON BOWERS: «At the South Pole.», Gelatin Silver Print. [10¾ x 15in. (27.2 x 38.1cm.) ].
    Scandinavian Art & Rare Books Auctions, Dec. 4: ELEAZAR ALBIN: «A natural History of Birds.» + «A Supplement», 1738-40. Wonderful coloured plates.
    Scandinavian Art & Rare Books Auctions, Dec. 4: PAUL GAIMARD: «Voyage de la Commision scientific du Nord, en Scandinavie, […]», c. 1842-46. ONLY HAND COLOURED COPY KNOWN WITH TWO ORIGINAL PAINTINGS BY BIARD.
    Scandinavian Art & Rare Books Auctions, Dec. 4: JAMES JOYCE: «Ulysses», 1922. FIRST EDITION IN ORIGINAL WRAPPERS.
  • Sotheby’s
    Book Week
    December 9-17, 2025
    Sotheby’s, Dec. 11: Darwin and Wallace. On the Tendency of Species to form Varieties..., [in:] Journal of the Proceedings of the Linnean Society, Vol. III, No. 9., 1858, Darwin announces the theory of natural selection. £100,000 to £150,000.
    Sotheby’s, Dec. 11: J.K. Rowling. Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone, 1997, first edition, hardback issue, inscribed by the author pre-publication. £100,000 to £150,000.
    Sotheby’s, Dec. 11: Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart. Autograph sketchleaf including a probable draft for the E flat Piano Quartet, K.493, 1786. £150,000 to £200,000.
    Sotheby’s, Dec. 12: Hooke, Robert. Micrographia: or some Physiological Descriptions of Minute Bodies made by Magnifying Glasses. London: James Allestry for the Royal Society, 1667. $12,000 to $15,000.
    Sotheby’s, Dec. 12: Chappuzeau, Samuel. The history of jewels, first edition in English. London: T.N. for Hobart Kemp, 1671. $12,000 to $18,000.
    Sotheby’s, Dec. 12: Sowerby, James. Exotic Mineralogy, containing his most realistic mineral depictions, London: Benjamin Meredith, 1811, Arding and Merrett, 1817. $5,000 to $7,000.
  • Rare Book Hub is now mobile-friendly!
  • Swann
    Maps & Atlases, Natural History & Color Plate Books
    December 9, 2025
    Swann, Dec. 9: Lot 156: Cornelis de Jode, Americae pars Borealis, double-page engraved map of North America, Antwerp, 1593.
    Swann, Dec. 9: Lot 206: John and Alexander Walker, Map of the United States, London and Liverpool, 1827.
    Swann, Dec. 9: Lot 223: Abraham Ortelius, Typus Orbis Terrarum, hand-colored double-page engraved world map, Antwerp, 1575.
    Swann
    Maps & Atlases, Natural History & Color Plate Books
    December 9, 2025
    Swann, Dec. 9: Lot 233: Aaron Arrowsmith, Chart of the World, oversize engraved map on 8 sheets, London, 1790 (circa 1800).
    Swann, Dec. 9: Lot 239: Fielding Lucas, A General Atlas, 81 engraved maps and diagrams, Baltimore, 1823.
    Swann, Dec. 9: Lot 240: Anthony Finley, A New American Atlas, 15 maps engraved by james hamilton young on 14 double-page sheets, Philadelphia, 1826.
    Swann
    Maps & Atlases, Natural History & Color Plate Books
    December 9, 2025
    Swann, Dec. 9: Lot 263: John Bachmann, Panorama of the Seat of War, portfolio of 4 double-page chromolithographed panoramic maps, New York, 1861.
    Swann, Dec. 9: Lot 265: Sebastian Münster, Cosmographei, Basel: Sebastian Henricpetri, 1558.
    Swann, Dec. 9: Lot 271: Abraham Ortelius, Epitome Theatri Orteliani, Antwerp: Johann Baptist Vrients, 1601.
    Swann
    Maps & Atlases, Natural History & Color Plate Books
    December 9, 2025
    Swann, Dec. 9: Lot 283: Joris van Spilbergen, Speculum Orientalis Occidentalisque Indiae, Leiden: Nicolaus van Geelkercken for Jodocus Hondius, 1619.
    Swann, Dec. 9: Lot 285: Levinus Hulsius, Achtzehender Theil der Newen Welt, 14 engraved folding maps, Frankfurt: Johann Frederick Weiss, 1623.
    Swann, Dec. 9: Lot 341: John James Audubon, Carolina Parrot, Plate 26, London, 1827.

Article Search

Archived Articles