Rare Book Monthly

Articles - May - 2012 Issue

Tragic End to the Life of Shakespearean Book Thief

Raymond Scott and “assistant” arrive at court for earlier hearing.

Raymond Scott and “assistant” arrive at court for earlier hearing.

The decision was hardly unexpected, but the sentence was somewhat surprising. England has not been noted for unduly harsh punishment since they closed the Tower, but Scott was sentenced to eight years in prison. The high value of the book didn't help, nor did his past history, though petty. Perhaps his flamboyant style was unhelpful as well. Nonetheless, we have seen much lighter sentences for larger and more destructive book thefts in America, normally the harsher, more “law and order” jurisdiction. Eight years is a long time.

At first, Scott seemed to adjust to prison life fairly well. Several months in, he spoke about how they had him working in the prison library. He was learning bookkeeping, but “not the extended borrowing type,” he joked. He had earned a certain status among his fellow prisoners for his audacity and celebrity. Scott was planning an appeal, at least of the length of his sentence if not the conviction, and was working on an autobiography he dubbed “Shakespeare and Love.” All seemed well, considering the circumstances.

Sadly, it did not turn out so well for Scott. Society determined his debt to it, and like his debt to Mastercard, it was more than he could handle. Scott became depressed. The length of his sentence became unbearable. He became particularly down when another birthday passed for his elderly mother, and he was not there to share it. In February of this year, Scott wrote a letter to the Sunday Sun newspaper. The humor was gone. It was that of a desperate man, seeking the one type of salvation not available to a prisoner, at least not in this world – freedom. He revealed that he had been placed on suicide watch. “Thought last night it’d be nice to die peacefully in my sleep no more pain, a panacea,” he wrote.

Scott wrote disparagingly of the days when he made his flamboyant appearances in court. “The drunken buffoon attending court. Yuk. The ludicrous enterprise with the folio surely THAT person was mentally ill deluded not real in cloud cuckoo land.” he wrote the Sun. The desperation grows deeper in his words: “Just had the absolute worst week of my life. Total breakdown pacing round the cell all night shaking. The scales have fallen from my eyes it’s a waking nightmare. Not eating. Not sleeping. Mother came up on Wednesday - difficult visit she left worried naturally. How did I get into all this? Rescue me somebody please give me a second chance. Can’t cope. On suicide watch 'the orange book'. Dear me what a disaster, when I think what I had, now look at me living like an animal in a cage.”

No one rescued Scott. No one gave him a second chance. Perhaps no one could. Scott was colorful, eccentric, outrageous, a personality waiting for five decades to be released from a Walter Mitty body. For a year, it was. He had an elongated 15 minutes of fame. However, Scott was no hardened criminal. He was not prepared for the life after crime. The self-confidence melted under the reality of prison bars. His lawyer at trial attempted to paint Scott as a “naive mummy's boy” and an “old fool,” taken in by the charms of a young Cuban dancer. “He’s someone who genuinely believes a 21-year-old dancer is his fiancee,” the lawyer explained. It was almost certainly an accurate portrayal of Scott, even if it didn't help to get him off. He entertained us, provided us with a year of comic relief, but in reality, Raymond Scott was a man out of his element. It truly is sad. Scott could have been a minor celebrity, at least in his home town, if he had just have been able to express his colorful, underlying personality without resorting to crime. He could not, and as a result, Raymond Scott is with us no more, a victim of his own hand.

The Durham First Folio, however, is back where it belongs.


Posted On: 2020-09-20 15:20
User Name: brianr

Nothing tragic about Scott's death, I went to school with him. He was was a nutcase who contributed nothing to society.


Posted On: 2022-10-26 12:02
User Name: raymondscott

As a graduate of English literature who specializes in Shakespearean literature I daily handle several editions of Shakespeare's First Folio
and I know exactly which edition is the most authorative in terms of editorial theory and the closest we have or are likely to have to any
final published text authorized by the author, in the sense that it is the published text authorized on the author's death by his friends
and closest colleagues, such as John Heminges and Henry Condell, prominent members of William Shakespeare's company who performed his plays.
The First Folio of Shakespeare's Plays or Comedies, Histories, and Tragedies by William Shakespeare was published in 1623 in London.
For readers that are not familiar with the First Folio, the First Folio is the very first published collection of Shakespeare's plays.
It was compiled by John Heminges and Henry Condell who were William Shakespeare's friends and colleagues during his lifetime.
It is believed that 750 copies of the First Folio were published back in 1623 and there are only 235 copies known to exist today.
The Folger Shakespeare Library in Washington D.C. owns 82 of them and their books are all in far worse condition than this edition.
As a professional expert I own and use many prestigious editions daily. While I enjoy them all, I am particularly fond of this volume.
If you want an edition that has the look and feel of the original 17th century First Folio your best choice is ISBN 9789464437539 of
which I recently acquired this hardcover and that is now the pride of my bookshelf showing to relatives, friends and visitors of my home.
It is first and foremost a paragon of scholarship, though I admit that it is perhaps of limited interest to many in some of its aspects.
Dealing with the many variants found in the various editions of the First Folio, it might seem rather medieval in some respects.
Simply put, it is a First Folio that was made up of the best pages of all First Folios available and not just at the Folger Library.
The book is large, maybe somewhat unwieldy, and the style is unusual to read by today's standards, but on the whole it is a work of art.
This edition is the closest you'll ever get to owning your own First Folio, perhaps the Best Folio that will ever be available.
I enjoy reading and owning fine books. This volume is definitely as finely made as a First Folio of Shakespeare is likely to get.
It is beautifully bound in a fine, contemporary gilted binding and the book in its entirety is a pleasure to own and use.
For those readers who care for such things, this very impressive book will soon become the pride of any bookshelf.


Rare Book Monthly

  • Sotheby's
    Fine Books, Manuscripts & More
    Available for Immediate Purchase
    Sotheby’s: William Shakespeare.
    The Poems and Sonnets of William Shakespeare, 1960. 7,210 USD
    Sotheby’s: Charles Dickens.
    A Christmas Carol, First Edition, 1843. 17,500 USD
    Sotheby’s: William Golding.
    Lord of the Flies, First Edition, 1954. 5,400 USD
    Sotheby's
    Fine Books, Manuscripts & More
    Available for Immediate Purchase
    Sotheby’s: Lewis Carroll.
    Through the Looking Glass and What Alice Found There, Inscribed First Edition, 1872. 25,000 USD
    Sotheby’s: J.R.R. Tolkien.
    The Hobbit, First Edition, 1937. 12,000 USD
    Sotheby’s: John Milton.
    Paradise Lost, 1759. 5,400 USD

Article Search

Archived Articles

Ask Questions